Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Stop Selling RMR

  
  
  

A crazy statement from a SaaS company, huh? Here is why service providers should not focus on RMR.

Recently I received a proposal from a SaaS provider wherein the fee for the monthly service was described as… Recurring Monthly Revenue. Maybe I’m being an overly sensitive consumer, but I find this to be an absurd inversion of focus. I want my service provider to be focused on my needs, not their type of revenue stream.

How would you feel ordering fast food by saying, “I’d like one of your 80% margins and two 20% margins please. That’s how I felt signing a proposal that listed my service as RMR.

I humbly propose that we stop talking about RMR and flip the focus to where it should be: on the buyers. Customers are not shopping for Recurring Monthly Revenue; they’re acquiring a recurring service relationship. They’re getting capabilities they need and paying on a periodic basis. Service providers are not selling RMR, they’re selling a vendor-vested service relationship. Customers derive benefits from on-going service relationships that have distinct value over transactional relationships. Among the benefits are 1) committed service providers, 2) service costs that are pre-defined and stabilized, 3) Access to services they could not afford to build on their own

 So let’s try out a few new terms like Recurring Service Relationship (RSR) or Continuous Service Program (CSP), something other than teaching our salespeople to sell customers Recurring Monthly Revenue. 

- John Szczygiel

Comments

I like this Joelle...if our salespeople executed with RMR in mind we'd look just like installed software makers with designs on consulting fees, which our customers moved to the Cloud to avoid. ;-) Hope you are well.
Posted @ Thursday, October 07, 2010 8:42 AM by Rob Keenan
I'm guilty too! And yes, I love those new words....especially recurring service relationship! Fantastic!! Really elevates the stature of the integrator as well.
Posted @ Friday, October 08, 2010 8:39 AM by Deborah OMara
After getting past the initial shock, and poor taste, of seeing RMR mentioned to the end user in a proposal, one must ask the question regarding to whom the service is being sold: 
 
Many people in our industry concentrate on loading up features on the software, but that seldom makes the difference in a sale. If I had a euro for every sales meeting where a job was sold without the decision maker ever looking at the software.... 
 
In any case, we often forget who the customer really is. For many in the industry, the customer is not the end user, but the integrator/installer. It is he who must be excited about selling your product. It is he who puts the whole system together. We must all deliver to the end user, but the integrator is central.
Posted @ Sunday, October 10, 2010 10:40 PM by Juan Camión
John, 
 
It is true that if we use internal terminology to customers we are missing the opportunity to approach them as a customer rather a revenue stream. I like your suggestions.  
 
BR Jon
Posted @ Thursday, October 28, 2010 6:53 AM by Jon
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics